About 67 minutes
Over the Canadian Battlefields Notes of a Little Journey in France, in March, 1919 — Inside the Classic
Modern Nations
15,293 recorded words. 11 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #47269The source record for Kinston, Whitehall and Goldsboro (North Carolina) expedition, December, 1862 — Edition Insights measures this digital text at 17,765 words, 1 hr 18 min estimated reading time, and 4 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 18.9 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “United States -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865 -- Campaigns,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Explore this collection
These alternatives are selected using recorded categories and estimated reading time.
About 67 minutes
Modern Nations
15,293 recorded words. 11 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #47269About 92 minutes
Modern Nations
21,000 recorded words. 14 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #48714About 93 minutes
Modern Nations
21,363 recorded words. 15 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #48808Search stored excerpts and compare books → Choose by your preferences →
Choices use stored catalog measurements. Estimates vary with reading speed. A shared category is a catalog label, not a claim that two books have the same argument or literary quality.
Search reads excerpt text stored with this catalog and links to its associated Gutenberg record. The connection is stored in the site database; this tool does not recheck that every excerpt is word-for-word identical to that external record. Excerpt search does not cover every chapter and does not verify historical publication dates.
Catalog snapshot checked: 2026-09-25. Coverage: 91 public books, 91 available source excerpts.
Read the complete public-domain text at its original source.
Read on Project GutenbergW. W. Howe's 1890 compilation of the Kinston, Whitehall and Goldsboro expedition is built from contemporary newspaper dispatches, primarily the New York Herald and New York Times, supplemented by official reports and casualty lists. The work moves chronologically through three engagements, but its structure is not a seamless narrative: it alternates between immediate, on-the-ground reporting—often dated from the field—and retrospective summaries. The editor's hand is visible in the errata and index, which correct names and add battery references, suggesting a careful attempt to reconcile multiple sources. The dedication to mothers and comrades frames the text as a memorial, yet the body itself is largely tactical and logistical, with little sentimentality.
The expedition's opening is defined by halted movement. The first dispatch, dated December 11, 1862, records that the army encountered a road "densely blockaded by felled trees" extending "several hundred yards" through a swamp. This obstruction forces a halt, and the narrative lingers on the physical impediment—the swamp, the creeks, the felled timber—before any contact with the enemy. The pattern recurs: advances are repeatedly checked by terrain or enemy fire, and the text marks each pause with precise distances ("eighty or one hundred rods") and times ("3 p. m."). The reader is made aware of the slow, deliberate pace of the march, where progress is measured in yards and hours.
The battles are rendered through sound and sight. The enemy's battery fires "grape and canister" and later "twelve-pound shells"; Union batteries respond in kind. The description of the Neuse River bridge being "saturated with turpentine" and then imperfectly set on fire is a rare sensory detail—the smell and flammability of turpentine are implied but not stated. The text notes that the fire was "easily extinguished by the aid of the artillery buckets, used for watering the horses," a practical detail that grounds the scene in the material realities of the campaign. The recurring mention of specific battery types (Schenck's, Belger's Rhode Island) and the correction of battery numbers in the errata indicate a concern for accurate ordnance identification.
A key tactical movement is the attempt to outflank the enemy via the "river road." General Foster orders Colonel Heckmann to take his brigade to the right and attack the enemy's left flank. The text follows this maneuver closely, noting how the artillery "closely followed the infantry" and how a "dashing charge" eventually broke the Confederate line. The river itself becomes a boundary: the enemy retreats "across the bridge, over the Neuse, clear to and through the village of Kinston." The pursuit is described in terms of water depth—"the water was so deep that it reached the bellies of our cavalry horses." The landscape—roads, rivers, bridges, woods, fields—is not just backdrop but an active element in the tactical decisions recorded.
The text is punctuated by moments of loss that are noted but not elaborated. The death of Colonel C. O. Gray is given its own section, and the "Losses in the Three Battles" is a separate chapter. Yet within the dispatches, casualties are often mentioned in passing: Private Chapman wounded in the thigh, one man wounded in the Ninth New Jersey during a skirmish, and the later note that "they suffered subsequently." The enemy's losses are "unknown, but supposed to be heavy." This asymmetry—precise Union casualty figures versus vague estimates for the Confederates—reflects the source material's perspective. The index, with its corrections and additions, suggests an ongoing effort to account for all units involved, even those initially omitted.
Readers approaching this work should attend to its composite nature: it is not a single author's narrative but a mosaic of dispatches, official reports, and editorial corrections. The movement between scenes is often abrupt, and the text assumes familiarity with military terminology and geography. The errata and index are not afterthoughts but integral to understanding the work's construction. For those interested in the mechanics of Civil War campaigning—the halts, the flanking moves, the artillery exchanges—this compilation offers a ground-level view, albeit one filtered through the lens of contemporary journalism and retrospective editing.
Reading this editorial note on the December expedition, I recalled my grandfather’s quiet habit of tracing troop movements on old maps, his finger pausing at rivers we’d later fish. That same patient attention to place and time surfaced while revisiting Eighteen months in the war zone — Edition Insights, where the weight of a single season felt heavier than any campaign summary.
Answer a few questions and save a private reflection on this device.